Unjustly Convicted: An Appeal for International Support highlights some of the injustices and unscrupulous trial tactics used by the State of Ohio to secure my husband’s conviction, a conviction that is a serious affront and travesty of justice.

             It addresses how the State concealed the truth, manipulated and fabricated facts, used coerced and perjured testimony from prison snitches, played on the racial and religious prejudice of his jury, and used him as the scapegoat for the prison uprising. In sum, it shows how the State deliberately abused its power to convict him. As a result justice has been forsaken, and a clear examination of the facts in his case will show a dereliction of justice. But this type of misuse of public office by prosecutors should come as no surprise since prosecutorial misconduct has become a very common occurrence in high-profile cases in this country.

             Finally, it’s an appeal for international support—be it political, legal, financial, media exposure or otherwise—that will help him regain remission back into society and home to his family.

                                                           --Saadiqah Amatullah Hasan

Unjustly Convicted: An Appeal for International Support 

By Siddique Abdullah Hasan

             In the aftermath of the 1993 prison uprising, which rocked the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (SOCF) in Lucasville, the State of Ohio was under enormous political pressure to bring to justice the perpetrators of certain violent crimes; especially the senseless murder of its prison guard, Robert Vallandingham.

             With not a single soul coming forth with any concrete information, and with being faced with the humongous task of having to both investigate and solve the largest crime scene in its history, the State of Ohio did the unthinkable—it fabricated evidence and repeatedly utilized perjured testimony to obtain convictions, notwithstanding the law and Disciplinary Rules which prohibit attorneys from using fraudulent, false, or perjured testimony or evidence. I am one of those innocent prisoners apprehended in the State’s diabolical scheme. Why?

             Because of my leadership role within the Islamic community, as well as the fact that I was an outspoken critic of the oppressive prison conditions and policies, the State sought to make me its prime scapegoat. Thus, I became the phantom “ring leader” of the uprising although there’s ample evidence to the contrary—most notably, an audiotape.

             There is no doubt that the effort to create the impression that I was the person responsible for the uprising, and the death of the prison guard, is the State’s fear and hatred of my religion. This became evident when, during the course of my trial in Cincinnati, the State repeatedly focused on my race, religion and Islamic attire—all to create an atmosphere of racial prejudice and Islamophobia before a predominately white and Catholic jury.

             To fully understand why I became the prime scapegoat, one has to understand what inadvertently prompted the uprising. To set the record straight, there was never any intent to be an uprising; instead, there was only a plan to be a “peaceful protest” against the Mantoux tuberculin test. In view of this, the State brought forth no aggravated riot charges, which would had been a felony offense.

             This particular TB test was being made mandatory upon all prisoners although other forms of TB testing were readily available and would have reached the same medical conclusion. Since this test contained phenol, an alcoholic substance that is prohibited for Muslims to have injected under their forearm, we had rejected taking it on religious grounds but did plea with the prison authorities to permit us to submit to an alternative which would not infringe upon our religious beliefs. Rather than trying to work out reasonable compromises and accommodations of our religious needs, the prison warden was dead set on forcing us to engage in conduct which was contrary to our religious beliefs and teachings.

             While I will concede that the TB test was the last straw which broke the camel’s back, the inhumane treatment and the long train of abuses are what induced some non-Muslims to seize the opportunity to instantaneously convert a peaceful protest into a full-scale rebellion. On the other hand, I cannot and will not concede that Muslims were responsible for non-Muslims’ actions; however, the State feels otherwise. And though I committed no crimes, especially not a senseless murder, the State has claimed that “I ordered the murder of its guard.” Yet, there is medical, physical and scientific evidence to refute its bogus claim.

             My conviction is based on nothing but snitch testimonies. That is, testimonies from snitchers whose hands were soaked in human blood as a result of assaults, kidnappings, murders, and other crimes they committed. These less-than-reliable witnesses testified that “I chaired the meeting where a unanimous vote was silently made to murder a guard if prisoners’ demands were not met,” and that “I personally ordered the guard’s murder just minutes before it happened.” In fact, the State’s star witness, who failed a polygraph test and who was originally charged with the guard’s murder, claimed he witnessed “a 45lb Olympic weight bar being placed on the front of the guard’s neck, with two inmates standing on opposite sides of it rocking back and forth.”

             The following facts, however, refute these bogus and uncollaborated claims:

1.      The State has reluctantly conceded that my voice is not heard on the audiotape which it secretly recorded of the meeting. It is also interesting to note that this audiotape was used as evidence in other prisoners’ trials, and it was vital in securing their convictions. But it was not used in my trial after we requested funds for an expert to prove that the audiotape was altered.

2.      The State has also reluctantly conceded that I did not chair the meeting, but another prisoner did. Besides, how could I have chaired it when I wasn’t even present?

3.      The State’s own expert witness, Dr. Patrick M. Fardal, the chief forensic pathologist and deputy coroner for Franklin County, who conducted nearly 4,000 autopsies, stated under oath that “he could state to a reasonable degree of medical certainty or scientific certainty that what the star witness described about the weight bar did not occur.”

4.      The star witness has recanted his testimony in two separate affidavits, and has admitted the State coerced him to lie in order to secure my conviction.

             While these are only some of the problems in my case, there are numerous others which I have not stated due to time and space constraints. But I can assure you I committed no crimes, unless being a Muslim in a non-Muslim society is a crime. Thus, my conviction and the death penalty imposed upon me is a direct result of perjured testimonies. Likewise, my conviction and death sentence is a direct result of the State’s desire to take away our right to practice our religion.

             It is easier to attack someone you do not understand. The fear of the unknown is widespread and contagious; yet, if those who are different—who engage in practices the majority do not fully understand—cannot be protected, then no one can. I believed that the United States was a nation of laws; moreover, I believed that those laws were for everyone, not just a few.

             Thus I am making an appeal for international support, in hope that it will help me to regain my rightful freedom back into society because this fight for my freedom is too hard for me to even conceive achieving alone. Therefore, I need for you to be aware of my case, to be concerned about my case and, most importantly, to help. Not just for me, but for yourself, your family and your friends. If this gross miscarriage of justice can happen to me, then it can happen to anyone. As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”